Keep clinical practice up to date with the research.
New research is matched to the procedures and guidelines it affects, and you're told when a procedure has fallen behind the evidence.
Research translation
Findings this quarter
41
Procedures affected
7
Need review
3
| Finding | Procedure | Current version | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earlier mobilisation after hip fracture | Ortho post-op care | 2023 | Review |
| Revised sepsis screening threshold | ED triage | 2025 | Up to date |
| Shorter antibiotic course | Surgical prophylaxis | 2022 | Review |
How it's done today
Clinical teams are meant to keep procedures in line with current evidence. In practice, knowing which new paper affects which procedure lives in people's heads and inboxes, and it leaves when they do.
What the workflow does
- 1
Reads the research
Findings, the population studied, and the strength of the evidence.
- 2
Reads your procedures
What each one says, and when it was last reviewed.
- 3
Matches them up
Which findings touch which procedures, each linked to its source.
- 4
Tells you what's behind
An alert when a procedure is older than the evidence that affects it.
A public health service built this over its research papers and clinical procedures to see where practice had fallen behind.
- to match new research to procedures, down from weeks
- Minutes
- checked against new evidence
- Every procedure
Built in the Sercha builder, over the firm's own files. The firm isn't named here.
Questions
- Does it decide what practice should be?
- No. It shows which findings touch which procedures, with the source for each. Clinicians decide what changes.
- Does it pick up new papers?
- Yes. When new papers are added to the connected folder, they're read and matched on their own.
See it on your own documents.
Tell us your industry and what you'd build, and we'll set the demo up around it.
Book a demo